science work plan
NEW! SCIENCE WORK PLAN FOR 2025-2029
Beginning in November 2023 the Partnership will begin developing a Science Work Plan for the period 2025-2029. Partnership staff and Panel members will engage the science community, Tribes, community-based organizations, and others to understand information needs, ongoing research and information gathering, and remaining gaps, as well as opportunities to improve the development and transfer of knowledge in Puget Sound. This understanding may come from publications or conversations. The Panel will develop science work actions and broader recommendations to complete the plan late in 2024.
For more information, or to submit comments about science needs or recommendations to improve science to support Puget Sound recovery, contact:
Science and Evaluation Director
360.791.2879 | Scott.Redman@psp.wa.gov
The Science Work Plan for 2020-2024
The Science Panel is a group of 14 top scientists in Washington State and the Pacific Northwest that provides advice and guidance to the Puget Sound Partnership (Partnership) to develop a comprehensive, science-based plan to restore Puget Sound.
The Science Panel developed a Science Work Plan for 2020-2024 (access here), which describes strategies to improve our collective understanding of Puget Sound. Implementing this Science Work Plan will generate information that the Puget Sound recovery community uses to improve decision-making and accelerate recovery across Puget Sound for the benefit of the people and communities in the region and the ecosystems on which they depend. The Science Work Plan for 2020-2024 was adopted by the Science Panel on December 10, 2020 and approved by the Leadership Council on December 17, 2020.
Supporting and growing an inclusive knowledge network
One prominent part of the Science Work Plan is to develop a more inclusive, more coordinated network of organizations and entities dedicated to building our understanding of Puget Sound – expanding beyond western science to also emphasize the central importance of Indigenous knowledge and environmental justice.
The Partnership recognizes that implementing this vision will require a collaborative approach and leadership from organizations dedicated to Indigenous knowledge and environmental justice. In this spirit, Partnership staff and Panel members will be reaching out to potential partners to listen and open conversations about what this network might look like, including purpose, scope, roles for key partners, potential partnership structure, and funding (see graphic below, courtesy of the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board's "Partnership Learning Project").
Throughout this process, the Partnership is being intentional to respectfully acknowledge other networks in the region and create space for organizations that focus on equity and that may not have worked closely with the Partnership before. As conversations with equity-focused organizations begin to take shape, the Partnership aims to provide different avenues for new and existing partners to share creative ideas that will allow us to have a collective conversation and promote valuable new connections among organizations.
We are committed to a years-long process to share the implementation of the Science Work Plan through a knowledge network that is more inclusive and more coordinated. In this spirit, the Partnership welcomes your suggestions and creativity.
If you'd like to join in a conversation, please contact Scott Redman, Science and Evaluation Director at the Puget Sound Partnership: firstname.lastname@example.org or Katherine Wyatt, Assistant Director of Science and Evaluation email@example.com.
Summary of the Science Work Plan for 2020-2024
The Puget Sound Partnership seeks to support greater understanding of the health and recovery of Puget Sound among decision makers and the public, and encourage them to make effective, high-impact recovery decisions through the application of science. Over 760 organizations work on Puget Sound recovery in one way or another, and the public has a high interest in Puget Sound recovery.
This work plan offers an opportunity to engage leaders of regional science programs in a discussion of priority science needs. The term science here is used to include western science, but also importantly programs dedicated to Indigenous knowledge and environmental justice. This document should promote conversations about how to work together effectively as a more inclusive, more coordinated network that builds understanding and improves the capacity to support the people and communities in Puget Sound and the ecosystems they depend on.
The Science Panel and Partnership staff commit to working with potential new partners and existing partners to understand how individuals and institutions can help implement the described Science Work Actions and broader recommendations in this document. The Science Panel envisions that as we collaborate on implementing the actions and recommendations in this document, the process will mature over time to co-develop future Science Work Plans and co-lead their implementation. The Science Panel’s expectation is that this collaboration will spur innovative thinking and mobilize additional resources.
Section 1: Approach to the 2020-2024 Science Work Plan
This document builds from a foundation of the Science Panel’s objectives for system-oriented science. It also incorporates recommendations from others about the science needed to identify, coordinate, and implement effective recovery and protection strategies for the Puget Sound ecosystem. This document follows the science work planning approach specified in Washington State statute at RCW 90.71.290(5).
In developing this document, the Panel focused on identifying two complementary questions:
- What are the priority Science Work Actions for 2020-2024?
- What broader recommendations should be pursued to improve ongoing science and its dissemination?
Section 2: Objectives for selecting and prioritizing Science Work Actions
Science Work Actions within the Science Work Plan prioritize scientific research that can:
- change the policy landscape
- spur science innovation
- add value through addressing critical gaps and uncertainties or taking larger temporal or spatial perspectives,
- work to link socio-ecological resilience, or
- ensure that critical ongoing work continues.
These objectives were collectively developed and revised by the Science Panel in advance of evaluating Science Work Actions.
Section 3: Priority Science Work Actions
Partnership staff compiled recommendations from the recovery community, with an initial focus on materials that articulated the science and questions from managers and policymakers. These recommendations address a wide scope of topics. Topical experts from the Science Panel looked at recommendations within their field of expertise and suggested potential Science Work Actions that reflected the content and intent of multiple recommendations. Science Work Actions represent discrete and actionable areas of investigation that a scientific study could reasonably be initiated to answer or address. The Science Panel will use the objectives articulated in section 3 to evaluate each Science Work Action. Preliminary scoring of Science Work Actions is presented in Appendix B.
Section 4: Recommendations to improve ongoing science
- Collaboratively develop a more inclusive, more coordinated network dedicated to western science, Indigenous knowledge, and environmental justice to support Puget Sound ecosystem recovery
- Improve incorporation of Indigenous knowledge into science and monitoring efforts
- Develop capacity and coordinate efforts to assess and report on ecosystem conditions and the effectiveness of strategies and actions
- Coordinate production and use of interdisciplinary research that explores and emphasizes the integrated nature of socio-ecological systems
- Build and sustain robust programs and relationships across science-policy interfaces to inform recovery
- Communicate science findings clearly and to the appropriate audiences
- Develop and analyze alternative future scenarios to explore and express desired futures and evaluate trade-offs among possible approaches
Last updated: 01/15/21